![]() ![]() The legislation calls out by name a variety of implicated industries, including the hot-button AI, biotech and telecommunications sectors, but also industries less often associated with national security, like cloud services and social media. With a growing list of bipartisan cosponsors, support from House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), and an endorsement from President Joe Biden, the bill has a real chance of becoming law. government surveillance in the wake of 9/11. Former Obama Administration official Kevin Xu argued that “the RESTRICT Act could be the largest expansion of executive power in the name of national security since the USA PATRIOT Act”, referring to controversial Bush-era legislation that allowed for increased U.S. ![]() Some observers have pointed out the bill’s broad coverage of many industries and the wide-ranging authority it would give the Commerce Secretary. in which foreign countries deemed adversaries have an interest, for the purposes of protecting national security. ![]() The bill would require the Commerce Department to identify and restrict information and communications technology (ICT) transactions in the U.S. Warner (D-VA) this month, and 19 other senators now cosponsor the bill. The Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology, or RESTRICT Act, was introduced by Senators John Thune (R-SD) and Mark R. But despite the attention the hearing garnered on both sides of the Pacific, Chinese internet and communications tech companies were likely focused on other developments in Congress that could threaten their own business in the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |